6645 Week 1 Assignment
February 26, 2025PRAC 6635 Week 7 Assignment
July 4, 2025Week 5: Assignment 2, Part 1: Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation and Patient Case Presentation, Video Case Presentation
Comprehensive psychiatric evaluations are a way to reflect on your practicum experiences and connect the experiences to the learning you gain from your weekly Learning Resources. Comprehensive notes, such as the ones required in this practicum course, are often used in clinical settings to document patient care.
For this Assignment, you will document information about a patient that you examined during the last 5 weeks, using the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template provided. You will then use this note to develop and record a case presentation for this patient.
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
To Prepare
- Select a patient that you examined during the last 5 weeks. Review prior resources on the disorder this patient has.
- It is recommended that you use the Kaltura Media tool to record and upload your assignment.
- Review the Kaltura Media resource in the Classroom Support Center area (accessed via the Help button).
- Conduct a Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation on this patient using the template provided in the Learning Resources. There is also a completed exemplar document in the Learning Resources so that you can see an example of the types of information a completed evaluation document should contain. All psychiatric evaluations must be signed by your Preceptor. You will submit your document in Week 5 Assignment, Part 2 area and you will include the complete Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation as well as have your preceptor sign the completed assignment. You must submit your documents using Turnitin. Please Note: Electronic signatures are not accepted. If both files are not received by the due date, Faculty will deduct points per the Walden Late Policies.
- Develop a video case presentation, based on your progress note of this patient, that includes chief complaint; history of present illness; any pertinent past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, family history; most recent mental status exam; and current psychiatric diagnosis, including differentials that were ruled out.
- Include at least five (5) scholarly resources to support your assessment and diagnostic reasoning.
Ensure that you have the appropriate lighting and equipment to record the presentation
The Assignment
Record yourself presenting the complex case for your clinical patient.
Do not sit and read your written evaluation! The video portion of the assignment is a simulation to demonstrate your ability to succinctly and effectively present a complex case to a colleague for a case consultation. The written portion of this assignment is a simulation for you to demonstrate to the faculty your ability to document the complex case as you would in an electronic medical record. The written portion of the assignment will be used as a guide for faculty to review your video to determine if you are omitting pertinent information or including non-essential information during your case staffing consultation video.
In your presentation:
- Dress professionally and present yourself in a professional manner.
- Display your photo ID at the start of the video when you introduce yourself.
- Ensure that you do not include any information that violates the principles of HIPAA (i.e., don’t use the patient’s name or any other identifying information).
- Present the full case. Include chief complaint; history of present illness; any pertinent past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, family history; most recent mental status exam; and current psychiatric diagnosis, including differentials that were ruled out.
- Report normal diagnostic results as the name of the test and “normal” (rather than specific value). Abnormal results should be reported as a specific value.
Be succinct in your presentation, and do not exceed 8 minutes. Address the following:
- Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their personal and medical history? What are their symptoms of concern? How long have they been experiencing them, and what is the severity? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning?
- Objective: What observations did you make during the interview and review of systems?
- Assessment: What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three (3) possible diagnoses. List them from highest to lowest priority. What was your primary diagnosis, and why?
- Reflection notes: What would you do differently in a similar patient evaluation? Reflect on one social determinant of health according to the HealthyPeople 2030 (you will need to research) as applied to this case in the realm of psychiatry and mental health. As a future advanced provider, what are one health promotion activity and one patient education consideration for this patient for improving health disparities and inequities in the realm of psychiatry and mental health? Demonstrate your critical thinking.
By Day 7
Submit your Video Case Presentation.
Note: In Week 5: Assignment, Part 2 you will submit two (2) files for the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation, including a Word document and scanned PDF/images of the completed assignment signed by your Preceptor.
submission information
1. Click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
2. Next, click Text Entry and then click the Embed Kaltura Media button.
3. Select your recorded video under My Media.
4. Check the box for the End-User License Agreement and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
| PRAC_6635_Week5_Assignment2_Part1_Rubric | ||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Photo ID display and professional attire | 5 to >0.0 pts Excellent Photo ID is displayed. The student is dressed professionally. 0 pts Poor Photo ID is not displayed. Student must remedy this before grade is posted. The student is not dressed professionally. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Time | 5 to >0.0 pts Excellent The video does not exceed the 8-minute time limit. 0 pts Poor The video exceeds the 8-minute time limit. (Note: Information presented after the 8 minutes will not be evaluated for grade inclusion.) | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of chief complaint and history of present illness | 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete description of the chief complaint and history of present illness. 4 to >3.0 pts Good The student provides an accurate description of the chief complaint and history of present illness. 3 to >1.0 pts Fair The student provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete description of the chief complaint and history of present illness, or description is missing. 1 to >0 pts Poor The student provides a completely inaccurate, or incomplete description of the chief complaint and history of present illness, or the description is missing. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history | 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete description of past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history. 4 to >3.0 pts Good The student provides an accurate description of past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history. 3 to >1.0 pts Fair The student provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete description of psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history, or description is missing. 1 to >0 pts Poor The student provides a completely inaccurate, or incomplete description of psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history, or description is missing. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Discussion of most recent mental status exam and observations made during interview and review of systems | 15 to >13.0 pts Excellent The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete discussion of results from most recent mental status exam and observations made during interview and review of systems. 13 to >11.0 pts Good The student provides an accurate discussion of results from most recent mental status exam and observations made during interview and review of systems. 11 to >10.0 pts Fair The student provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete discussion of results from most recent mental status exam and observations made during interview and review of systems. 10 to >0 pts Poor All or most of the discussion is inaccurate or missing. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Discussion of diagnostics with results | 10 to >8.0 pts Excellent The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete discussion of diagnostics with results. 8 to >7.0 pts Good The student provides an accurate discussion of diagnostics with results. 7 to >6.0 pts Fair The student provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete discussion of diagnostics with results. 6 to >0 pts Poor All or most of the discussion is inaccurate or missing. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Diagnostic Impression with three (3) differential diagnoses Reflection on this case | 25 to >22.0 pts Excellent The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete diagnostic impression with three (3) differentials….Reflections are thorough, thoughtful, and demonstrate critical thinking. …Reflections contain all 3 elements from the assignment directions. 22 to >19.0 pts Good The student provides an accurate diagnostic impression with three (3) differentials. …Reflections demonstrate critical thinking. …Reflections contain 2 of the elements from the assignment directions. 19 to >17.0 pts Fair The student provides a vague, inaccurate, less than 3, or incomplete diagnostic impression with differentials…. Reflections are somewhat general or do not demonstrate critical thinking…. Reflections contain 1 of the required elements from the assignment directions. 17 to >0 pts Poor All or most of the discussion is inaccurate or missing. No diagnostic impression and less than 2 differential diagnoses…. Reflections are incomplete, inaccurate, or missing. … There are no Reflections elements from the assignment directions. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Presentation style | 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Presentation style is exceptionally clear, professional, and focused. 4 to >3.0 pts Good Presentation style is clear, professional, and focused. 3 to >2.0 pts Fair Presentation style is mostly clear, professional, and focused 2 to >0 pts Poor Presentation style is unclear, unprofessional, and/or unfocused. | 5 pts |
Total Points: 75
Week 5: Assignment 2, Part 2
Comprehensive psychiatric evaluations are a way to reflect on your practicum experiences and connect the experiences to the learning you gain from your weekly Learning Resources. Comprehensive notes, such as the ones required in this practicum course, are often used in clinical settings to document patient care.
For this Assignment, you will document information about a patient that you examined during the last 5 weeks, using the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template provided. You will then use this note to develop and record a case presentation for this patient.
To Prepare
- Select a patient that you examined during the last 5 weeks. Review prior resources on the disorder this patient has.
- In Week 5: Assignment 2, Part 1, you submitted the Video Evaluation Presentation.
- In Week 5: Assignment 2, Part 2, you will submit the documentation.
- Conduct a Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation on this patient using the template provided in the Learning Resources. There is also a completed exemplar document in the Learning Resources so that you can see an example of the types of information a completed evaluation document should contain. All psychiatric evaluations must be signed, and each page must be initialed by your Preceptor. You will submit your document in Week 5 Assignment, Part 2 area and you will include the complete Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation as a Word document, as well as a PDF/images of each page that is initialed and signed by your Preceptor. You must submit your document using Turn It In. Please Note: Electronic signatures are not accepted. If both files are not received by the due date, Faculty will deduct points per the Walden Late Policies.
- Develop a video case presentation, based on your progress note of this patient, that includes chief complaint; history of present illness; any pertinent past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, family history; most recent mental status exam; and current psychiatric diagnosis, including differentials that were ruled out.
- Include at least five (5) scholarly resources to support your assessment and diagnostic reasoning.
- Ensure that you have the appropriate lighting and equipment to record the presentation.
Assignment
Record yourself presenting the complex case for your clinical patient.
Do not sit and read your written evaluation! The video portion of the assignment is a simulation to demonstrate your ability to succinctly and effectively present a complex case to a colleague for a case consultation. The written portion of this assignment is a simulation for you to demonstrate to the faculty your ability to document the complex case as you would in an electronic medical record. The written portion of the assignment will be used as a guide for faculty to review your video to determine if you are omitting pertinent information or including non-essential information during your case staffing consultation video.
In your presentation:
- Dress professionally and present yourself in a professional manner.
- Display your photo ID at the start of the video when you introduce yourself.
- Ensure that you do not include any information that violates the principles of HIPAA (i.e., don’t use the patient’s name or any other identifying information).
- Present the full case. Include chief complaint; history of present illness; any pertinent past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, family history; most recent mental status exam; and current psychiatric diagnosis, including differentials that were ruled out.
- Report normal diagnostic results as the name of the test and “normal” (rather than specific value). Abnormal results should be reported as a specific value.
Be succinct in your presentation, and do not exceed 8 minutes. Address the following:
- Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their personal and medical history? What are their symptoms of concern? How long have they been experiencing them, and what is the severity? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning?
- Objective: What observations did you make during the interview and review of systems?
- Assessment: What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three (3) possible diagnoses. List them from highest to lowest priority. What was your primary diagnosis, and why?
- Reflection notes: What would you do differently in a similar patient evaluation? Reflect on one social determinant of health according to the HealthyPeople 2030 (you will need to research) as applied to this case in the realm of psychiatry and mental health. As a future advanced provider, what are one health promotion activity and one patient education consideration for this patient for improving health disparities and inequities in the realm of psychiatry and mental health? Demonstrate your critical thinking.
By Day 7
Submit your Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation documentation, including a Word document and scanned PDF/images of each page that is initialed and signed by your Preceptor.
Note: In Week 5: Assignment 2, Part 1 you will submit the Video Evaluation Presentation.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
- To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK5Assgn2_LastName_Firstinitial
- Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
- Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
| PRAC_6635_Week5_Assignment2_Part2_Rubric | ||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation documentation | 25 to >22.0 pts Excellent The response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. Preceptor signature and date pdf/image is uploaded on the completed assignment (not an electronic signature). 22 to >19.0 pts Good The response accurately follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. Preceptor signature and date pdf/image is uploaded on the completed assignment but is an electronic signature. 19 to >17.0 pts Fair The response follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case, with some vagueness and inaccuracy. Preceptor signature and date pdf/image is missing from the uploaded completed assignment. 17 to >0 pts Poor The response incompletely and inaccurately follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. No preceptor signature. | 25 pts |
Total Points: 25
Week 5 Assignment 3: Midterm Clinical Evaluation in Meditrek
Now that you have been working at your practicum site for more than a month, it is time to test your skills. Your Preceptor will now assess your clinical skills in a midterm clinical evaluation. In preparation for your evaluation, you may wish to review your PMHNP Clinical Skills List and Resource Review document, as well as revisit the goals and objectives you established in Weeks 1 and 2.
To Prepare
Check with your Preceptor to verify that they have received Meditrek credentials.
Following your midterm evaluation, your Clinical Faculty and Preceptor will meet privately to discuss your results and feedback. Once you receive your feedback, compare your Preceptor’s evaluation with your self-evaluation to better understand your clinical performance.
Clinical Evaluation Grades
Your clinical instructor will complete an evaluation with feedback from your preceptor and evaluation of your work. Meditrek calculates an average score which will be used to determine the score that will be entered into Canvas for your evaluation grade.
If a midterm conference call and written evaluation are not completed by week 7, student cannot return to clinical site until its completion.
By Day 7
Your evaluation should be completed by your Preceptor.
Rubric
| PRAC_6635_Week5_Midterm_Evaluation | ||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Part 1: Preceptor submitted evaluation: Please use the preceptor evaluation average score to determine level of achievement*A score less than 3.0 will require a remediation plan at midterm evaluation *A score less than 3.0 will result in clinical failure and/or potential performance improvement opportunities at final evaluation | 40 to >39.0 pts Excellent Preceptor submitted evaluation average score equals 4.0 39 to >29.0 pts Good Preceptor submitted evaluation average score ranges from 3.99-3.0 29 to >19.0 pts Fair Preceptor submitted evaluation average score ranges from 2.99-2.0 19 to >0 pts Poor Preceptor submitted evaluation average score ranges from 1.99-0.0 | 40 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Part 2:Faculty Review of Overall Student Clinical Work Up to Evaluation Point: ᵒ Students overall communication is effective and professional. Student demonstrates professional behavior. *Student provides safe and competent patient care. * Student demonstrates an appropriate knowledge base for advanced practice. *Student applies appropriate evidence in managing patient care. *Student demonstrates initiative in seeking out new learning experiences, procedures, or treatment options. ᵒDemonstrates Cultural Sensitivity with delivery of care. | 40 to >29.0 pts Excellent *Preceptor expressed no concerns regarding student communication, professionalism, or dependability. … *Preceptor indicates student consistently provides safe and competent patient care. … *Students demonstrates outstanding knowledge base in their clinical encounters and clinical assignments. … *Student consistently applies appropriate evidence in patient care and clinical assignments. … *Student consistently demonstrates initiative in seeking out learning opportunities. … *Preceptor expresses student demonstrates exceptional knowledge and/or consistency of Cultural Competency and Awareness. 29 to >19.0 pts Good *Preceptor expressed minor concerns regarding student communication, professionalism, and dependability…. *Preceptor indicates student provides safe and competent patient care. … *Students demonstrates appropriate knowledge base in their clinical encounters and clinical assignments. … *Student applies appropriate evidence in patient care and clinical assignments. … *Student demonstrates initiative in seeking out learning opportunities. … *Preceptor expresses student demonstrates adequate knowledge and/or consistency of Cultural Competency and Awareness. 19 to >10.0 pts Fair *Preceptor expressed specific, detailed concerns regarding student communication, professionalism, and dependability. … Preceptor with specific, detailed concerns regarding safety or competent patient care. … *Students demonstrates inconsistent knowledge base in their clinical encounters and clinical assignments…. *Student inconsistently applies appropriate evidence in patient care and clinical assignments. … *Student inconsistently demonstrates initiative in seeking out learning opportunities. … *Preceptor expresses student demonstrates minimal knowledge and/or consistency of Cultural Competency and Awareness. 10 to >0 pts Poor *Preceptor indicated they would not precept student again or decides to terminate preceptor relationship during course. … *Preceptor expressed significant concerns regarding safety and competency in patient care. … *Students demonstrates inadequate knowledge base in their clinical encounters and clinical assignments. … *Student rarely applies appropriate evidence in patient care and clinical assignments. … *Student rarely demonstrates initiative in seeking out learning opportunities. … *Preceptor expresses student demonstrates lack of knowledge and/or consistency of Cultural Competency and Awareness. | 40 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome ᵒ Follows Clinical Policies and Procedures:ᵒ Completes clinical in timely manner ᵒ Documents Meditrek data following course requirements ᵒ Respectful behaviorsᵒ Active participant in patient care with computer camera on for telehealth clinical (if applicable) ᵒ Facilitates preceptor contact for evaluationsᵒ Student maintains academic integrity with all Meditrek documentation and submitted assignments. | 20 to >15.0 pts Excellent *Student follows clinical policies and procedures as set forth in Student Practicum Manual. … *If applicable, student is active in patient encounters with computer camera on 100% of time during telehealth sessions. … *Student consistently maintains HIPPA compliance and academic integrity with all Meditrek documentation and clinical related assignments. 15 to >10.0 pts Good *Student follows clinical policies and procedures 80 % of the time as set forth in Student Practicum Manual. … *If applicable, student is active in patient encounters with computer camera on 80% of time during telehealth sessions. … *Student maintains HIPPA compliance and academic integrity with all Meditrek documentation and clinical related assignments. 10 to >5.0 pts Fair *Student follows clinical policies and procedures 70 % of the time as set forth in Student Practicum Manual. … *If applicable, student is active in patient encounters with computer camera on 70% of time during telehealth sessions. … *Student with several concerns noted regarding academic integrity with all Meditrek documentation and clinical related assignments. 5 to >0 pts Poor *Student follows clinical policies and procedures 60%or less of the time as set forth in Student Practicum Manual. … *If applicable, student is active in patient encounters with computer camera on 60% or less of time during telehealth sessions…. *Student with significant concerns noted regarding academic integrity with all Meditrek documentation and clinical related assignments. | 20 pts |
Total Points: 100
